![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:12 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:14 |
|
About tree-fiddy.
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:17 |
|
Damn you I was just going to type that.
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:17 |
|
356 Doug.
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:19 |
|
below 400rwhp above 300rwhp
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:20 |
|
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:21 |
|
330 (age deduction?)
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:24 |
|
Cube x 2
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:24 |
|
I was thinkin 365, but since I cheated and peeked......335.
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:30 |
|
330?
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:34 |
|
I said "Dammit monster, I aint got yo tree-fiddy"
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:40 |
|
That depends, what dyno was it on?
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:40 |
|
3
![]() 03/14/2014 at 11:47 |
|
How many horsies?
I'm guessing tree fiddy.
![]() 03/14/2014 at 12:05 |
|
Not enough.
![]() 03/14/2014 at 12:26 |
|
More than you can afford pal
![]() 03/14/2014 at 13:36 |
|
lol? thats his car...
![]() 03/14/2014 at 13:37 |
|
405. Yes I'm guessing higher.
![]() 03/14/2014 at 16:52 |
|
Haha what a coincidence, I told you to go dyno it on Wednesday! Here's what I said: "Great write up Doug, now let's see you try and confirm all of the claimed performance statistics of the 360 in your next video. Perhaps dyno it first to confirm all the horses are still in the bay"
![]() 03/14/2014 at 18:07 |
|
I saw that! It was an interesting coincidence!!
![]() 03/14/2014 at 18:18 |
|
even 360 would be great
![]() 03/14/2014 at 21:02 |
|
400hp stock, minus 15% or 60 has us at 340. Plus possible underrating, minus age, let's say 335.
![]() 03/16/2014 at 17:31 |
|
This is one of the things that kind of irritates me when people claim HP numbers. The software from some of the dyno manufacturers have compensation for what they read. I forget who the preferred mfg is but when we looked at the data they looked like they were more optimistic than other mfgs.